Skip to main content

Conan Doyle Not Significant.

It's not just us who have politicians who don't respect cultural heritage. Like the ridiculous debacle with Rais Yatim and Bok House, Britain's Culture Secretary, Tessa Jowell, won't save the mansion where Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote The Hound of the Baskervilles.

From The Scotsman:
...the Culture Secretary has refused to save Undershaw, where Conan Doyle created Sherlock Holmes, because the Scottish writer "does not occupy a significant enough position in the nation's consciousness".

The house was partly designed in 1897 by Conan Doyle himself, along with architect Joseph Henry Hall, and was used by the writer to entertain many literary guests including Bram Stoker and the young Virginia Woolf.
"Does not occupy a significant enough position in the nation's consciousness". How dumb can you get?

I guess all politicians are cut from the same cloth, no matter where they hail from.


  1. What she means is, "I'd never heard of Conan Doyle until all this ruckus ensued. How can he possibly be important?"

    Yeah, despite the fact that he got knighted, he's really not important and didn't contribute much to the country. Yeah.

  2. I thought that ACD was just an author, and creator of one of the most famous characters ever written (some believe he really existed). I would say that in itself was quite a feat.
    But this man did far more. If you read Julian Barnes "Arthur and George", you will disover that Doyle took up a miscarriage of justice case highlighted it in the media, made a lot of noise - and eventually the English legal system was changed to create the Courts of Appeal Criminal Division. I would say that this man has played a significant role to ensure fairness of the justice system in England (and by extension to other places in the Commonwealth).

  3. ohhh i have such a good spooky story about this very house ... must tell you later

    (xeus would love it)

  4. irene, animah: If even Conan Doyle doesn't occupy a "significant enough position in the nation's consciousness", I wonder who does? J.K. Rowling??

    sharon: yes, yes! you must!

  5. Ted: Rowling? No, no, Jeffry Archer :-P

  6. Hi! I've been reading your blog from the beginning..Thank you for your wonderful work! Keep up the good work.

  7. 'tis a story for a foggy winter's night ... but yes, just buy me coffee one day and it's yours

  8. Haha.. no problem... but would a foggy monsoon night do?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOWTO: Get Rid of Silverfish

The bane of every book collecting person: the Silverfish. DUN DUN DUNNNNN!!! How to get rid of them? If one book has been infected, place it inside an air-tight plastic bag along with some silica gel desiccant. The silica gel is important to get rid of moisture, because you will now place the sealed plastic bag with the book in it inside the freezer. Leave it in there for a couple of days so that those bugs catch their death of cold. If you're feeling particularly paranoid, (like I usually am) feel free to leave the plastic bag in there for a week. If they're not dead, then you might likely have an infestation of zombie silverfish , which is out of the scope of this blogpost. But what if a whole colony of silverfish decided to invade your whole bookcase? Then you have to make sure you're ready for war. Place a generous amount of silica gel (or if you can find it, diatomaceous earth) behind your books at the back of the shelves so that moisture levels remain low.

Hitting 1000.

Last night Sharon quoted Raman of having said to writers when they bring him their manuscripts for publishing, "How many books have you read? Have you read a thousand books? If not, get out and go read a thousand books, then come back with your manuscript." His point being, you've got to have read a lot if you want to be a writer. And I thought to myself, a thousand books isn't so bad. I've probably read more. Er...Wrong. After some quick calculations, we determined that if a person read a book per week, it would take around 20 years to reach a thousand. I'm a slow reader. I'm only 25. There's no way I've read 1000 books my whole life! When I got home I counted the books in my house. I estimate I own around 300 books, probably another 300 left at my parents's house. That's only around 600 books that I own... and a lot less that I've read! So with that number in mind, I have resolved to start keeping track of my book reading. I ne

REVIEW: Pinball, 1973 by Haruki Murakami.

UPDATE: My Wind/Pinball review can be found here . ISBN: n/a Publisher: n/a Paperback: 160 pages In Murakami fan circles, simply owning a copy of Pinball, 1973 is a mark of hardcore-ness. Like Hear the Wind Sing before it, Haruki Murakami does not allow English translations of Pinball, 1973 to be published outside of Japan. Back in the 80s, Alfred Birnbaum translated it into English and Kodansha published it as a novel for Japanese students who wanted to improve their English. While the English edition of Hear the Wind Sing continues to be reprinted and sold in Japan (and available for a moderate sum via eBay, see my review ), Kodansha stopped its reprint runs of the English edition of Pinball, 1973 and has now become a collector's item, fetching vast amounts of money on auction sites and reseller stores. Last time I checked, the cheapest copy went for USD$2500. Of course, Murakami addicts or the curious can always download a less than legal PDF of the book, painst